Visual quality inspection
Check surfaces, completeness, assembly conditions and markings against agreed classes.
Data & AI Engineering
Computer Vision: Convert image data into verifiable decisions
From visual inspection to recognition and anomaly detection, we engineer the complete system: image capture, evaluation, model deployment and integration into operations.
Manual inspection and automated vision systems both depend on lighting, camera placement, material variation and the definition of an acceptable result. A demo model is not proof of reliability in a production line.
We define the inspection decision first: which defects matter, what false alarms cost and how the outcome changes the workflow. That guides the imaging setup, dataset and technical integration.
Check surfaces, completeness, assembly conditions and markings against agreed classes.
Recognize objects, components and relevant operational states.
Identify image regions and assess geometry with appropriate calibration.
Detect deviations when exhaustive defect examples are unavailable.
Transfer decisions to MES, ERP, controls or specialist applications with traceability.
Imaging hardware, optics and lighting are part of the system. A better neural network cannot compensate for every capture problem. We evaluate image conditions, annotation rules and representative datasets together.
We measure false positives, false negatives, throughput and robustness across real variations. Inference may run centrally or at the edge depending on latency, network availability and security constraints. High-impact decisions need explicit review paths.
Agree on defects, thresholds, throughput and response.
Review cameras, lighting, materials and process variation.
Compare classical image processing and trained models.
Build capture, inference, decisions and system interfaces.
Track capture quality, error rates, drift and process changes.
Run vision inference on local devices and production lines.
Apply vision to inspection and quality records in automotive.
See practical implementation requirements for mid-sized teams.
The number depends on variation and the defect classes. Representative coverage and an independent test set are more important than an arbitrary minimum.
Not in every case. The appropriate level of automation depends on failure risk and quality requirements.
No. Edge inference can be preferable for latency, connectivity or data restrictions.
Using meaningful error metrics, realistic data and measurements in the actual operating process.
Technical discovery
We review current systems, technical boundaries and a practical first implementation step.
Managing Director
aleks@valanor.co
+49 (0) 711 16 44 6 83
Lindenspürstrasse 22, 70176 Stuttgart
