Put machine events into context
Connect technical signals to the right asset, line and production order.
Industrial data integration
Integrate machine, ERP and MES data for production decisions
Production planning needs consistent relationships between machine events, orders, quality and material records. We design interfaces, timestamps, identifiers and validation checks that make production data usable in operational applications.
Machine signals use different rates, identifiers and formats than ERP and MES records. Without consistent timestamps and job identity, reports from the same shift may show contradictory production status.
A reliable solution begins with workflow, data ownership and accountable quality criteria—not a preferred platform or algorithm.
Machine records only become useful when they can be understood in the context of orders and operational decisions.
Connect technical signals to the right asset, line and production order.
Provide event sequences and documented status definitions for root-cause analysis.
Use agreed availability, performance and quality rules with validated time periods.
Make exceptions available in dashboards and role-specific workflows.
The integration layer ingests machine events and joins them with production orders from ERP or MES. Buffering, timestamp normalization, status mapping and data validation are core components.
A shared model prevents every dashboard from interpreting the same KPI differently. Data updates and exceptions must be traceable to their source, not silently corrected.
The technical implementation is part of Data & AI Engineering and Platform Engineering.
Prove data identity, consistency and usefulness on a bounded process before expanding.
Specify which downtime, order or quality decision needs more reliable information.
Review identifiers, timestamps, states and available interfaces.
Implement order context, time intervals and documented calculations.
Compare KPIs with actual events and exceptions before adding more assets.
Centralizing every raw machine signal is not always useful. Appropriate granularity, latency and volume depend on the operational question. Predictive maintenance models should only be considered once a reliable event history exists.
Evaluate KPI consistency, order association, visible data gaps and usefulness for production decisions. Compare alternative methods and relevant failure cases. Keep existing operational systems where they still fulfill their role.
These conditions affect the reliability of reporting and the engineering effort.
Clock differences and event intervals must not distort metrics.
Signals must map to the correct production step.
Distinguish production, setup, downtime and other relevant states.
Handle outages, late events and controlled replay without hidden data loss.
These workflows describe possible technical applications, not verified outcomes from a named customer. Architecture, data scope and measurable acceptance must be determined for the real production process.
Our manufacturing industry page explains the context of the five Valanor services. Data & AI Engineering covers the integration and analytical implementation.
Review industry requirements for shop-floor integration, quality and operational applications.
Technical decisions before connecting machines, ERP and MES.
We develop integrations and supporting applications; a functional MES does not need to be replaced.
Only when a business decision needs very low latency. Many planning and quality analyses do not.
By agreeing on availability, performance and quality definitions and validating time and order information.
Yes, when sufficient history, quality and a defined use case justify model development.
Discuss production data
Describe the production step, machine and order sources and desired outcome. Aleksandar Basara can discuss an appropriate technical starting point and data validation plan.
Managing Director
aleks@valanor.co
+49 (0) 711 16 44 6 83
Lindenspürstrasse 22, 70176 Stuttgart
