A complete switch to a new content management system would have incurred additional costs: existing content would have had to be migrated, editorial processes would have had to be adapted, and new workflows would have had to be implemented.
However, WordPress remained suitable as a system for managing editorial content. The actual requirements lay in the presentation, user experience, and additional features of the magazine.
That’s why we opted for a headless architecture. WordPress remained in place as the CMS, while the front end was developed independently using Next.js.
This separation allowed us to reuse existing structures and implement front-end development independently of the traditional WordPress theme system.
The result of this architectural decision: The existing CMS infrastructure was preserved. At the same time, we established the technical foundation for a custom-developed digital magazine—without the costs and risks of a complete CMS migration.